Abdul Majid Hakeem Ilahi, Representative of Iran`s Supreme Leader in India, on Wednesday asserted that Iran did not seek conflict with the United States, claiming that the war was “imposed” on the country. His remarks come in the backdrop of a temporary ceasefire agreement between the two nations, raising cautious hopes of de-escalation.
Claims of Extensive US Attacks and Military Targeting
Speaking in an interview, Ilahi alleged that the United States carried out over 10,000 attacks on Iran, primarily targeting its air defence systems and missile infrastructure. He claimed that the scale of aggression demonstrated a miscalculation by those who believed the conflict could be concluded swiftly, reported ANI.
“Iran did not want this war,” Ilahi told ANI, adding that initial expectations of a quick outcome were misplaced. He also alleged that civilian areas, including homes, were affected during the hostilities.
Iran Denies Targeting Civilians, Blames US Bases in Region
Ilahi maintained that Iran refrained from targeting civilians and instead focused only on American military bases. He accused the United States of launching attacks on Iran from bases located in Arab countries, thereby drawing the region into the conflict, reported ANI.
According to him, Iran’s response was limited to these installations, and it sought to avoid escalation with neighbouring nations. He expressed hope that regional countries would recognise the broader implications of such conflicts and avoid being drawn into future hostilities, reported ANI.
Strong Warning Over Future Escalation
Issuing a stern warning, Ilahi stated that Iran would respond forcefully if hostilities resumed. He suggested that critical global trade routes, including the Strait of Hormuz, could be impacted in the event of renewed conflict, reported ANI.
He further indicated that Iran’s energy infrastructure would not remain the only target in any future escalation, signalling the potential for wider disruptions.
Criticism of US Rhetoric and Leadership
Ilahi also criticised statements attributed to Donald Trump, particularly remarks about Iran’s historical legacy. He argued that such rhetoric reflected a lack of understanding of Iran’s cultural and civilisational depth.
He added that the conflict had triggered a strong domestic response, with citizens rallying to protect key infrastructure such as bridges, hospitals, and religious sites.
Ceasefire Opens Door for Diplomatic Engagement
The comments come shortly after the United States announced a temporary halt to its military campaign, proposing a two-week ceasefire window. Trump also indicated that a 10-point proposal put forward by Iran could serve as a basis for further negotiations.
Ilahi confirmed that discussions between both sides are expected to continue, with multiple countries playing a role in facilitating the ceasefire. He emphasised that ensuring civilian safety remains a top priority for Iran, reported ANI.
Uncertain Path Ahead Despite Temporary Calm
While the ceasefire has provided a pause in hostilities, uncertainties remain over its long-term sustainability. Both sides appear to be testing diplomatic options even as tensions linger beneath the surface.
The coming weeks are expected to be crucial in determining whether the temporary truce can evolve into a more permanent resolution or if the region risks slipping back into conflict.
(With inputs from ANI)